Re: The necessity of mental memes

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 07:28:23 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "RE: Why memeoids?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA05691 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 07:32:46 GMT
    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:28:23 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201190728.g0J7SNf19929@mail2.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.155]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > Re: The necessity of mental memesDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 12:31:06 -0500
    > "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Hi Joe Dees -
    >
    >>what no one has been able to explain to me is how, in the absence of a
    >>mental storage and percepttion/action translation pathway between the
    >>perception of another's actions and the replication of those actions by
    >>oneself, how the actions of one could ever become, by apprehension,
    >>learning and imitation, the actions of another.
    >
    >In other words, what the hell happens inside the brain?
    >
    >What part might memory play upon actions?
    >
    >In what way might the memory of a thing be guaranteed by the quality of
    >the thing itself, and by the quality and attention of the perception?
    >
    >Good questions.
    >
    >Last I knew, they're still working on it.
    >
    >But, how did you learn to waltz?
    >
    >Being shown is not enough.
    >
    >Even following the paths of the feet on one of those step guides is not
    >enough, well, it wasn't enough for me.
    >
    >I had to be shown, guided, and then I had to _discover myself doing it_,
    >physically.
    >
    >Same with a bicycle. I had to be shown, guided, picked up a few times,
    >and then I to _discover myself doing it_, physically.
    >
    >In other words, the behavior itself was a requirement of the learning
    >process.
    >
    >And, I really don't think there is _any_ situation where that is not true.
    >
    >So, how does a meme just sit inside? (How does one ride a bicycle between
    >one's ears?)
    >
    >That's what I want to know.
    >
    Praxis (that is, practical mastery) requires both theory AND practice, that is, BOTH internal and external. Neither alone will do.
    >
    >- Wade
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 10:08:54 GMT