Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 07:17:19 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: The necessity of mental memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA05627 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 07:21:43 GMT
    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:17:19 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201190717.g0J7HJZ19310@mail2.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.155]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 13:51:29 -0500
    > "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Hi Philip Jonkers -
    >
    >>With potential memes I mean
    >>memes laying dormant in the brain, abstractly
    >>speaking, waiting to be called upon and expressed
    >>or utilized if needed. Until that moment there is
    >>no way of telling whether the host contains them.
    >
    >Kinda why I wanted to know 'what'. Potential energy is recognizably
    >harnessable and, yeah, measurable, from physical conditions.
    >
    >Potential memes, (hey, let's be strict, internal memes...) are not. Until
    >they become apparent in behavior, there is no way to know if they are
    >there.
    >
    >However, culture itself is a set of physical conditions that set up
    >potentials.
    >
    >When at a formal dinner, if you have the potential meme for using a
    >fingerbowl, you will. If you don't, you will, perhaps, have the potential
    >meme of asking about things you are ignorant of, and find out through
    >questioning, preferably someone who just used one.... (But, don't ask
    >that guy who just put out his cigarette in it....)
    >
    >Most memetic experiments, and indeed, most 'memetic engineerings', are
    >just that- setting up situations where expected responses,
    >(internal/potential memes), will be realized. And, making little or
    >drastic changes in the parameters of the variables to get differing
    >responses, but, not, in any real sense, creating new memes.
    >
    >(I remember, back in the good old days of experimental music, how every
    >performance was called a 'realization'.... Ah, art.)
    >
    >If there could be such a thing as potential memes, then I would concede
    >to such a thing as potential art.
    >
    >But, I don't.
    >
    >Memes are out there.
    >
    >Culture is the matrix of memetic behavior.
    >
    And human minds (the emergent products of our physical substrate brains) are the petri dishes in which memes are 'cultured'.
    >
    >- Wade
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 10:00:48 GMT