RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 08:41:25 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA02261 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 18 Jan 2002 08:45:50 GMT
    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:41:25 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201180841.g0I8fPV02805@mail17.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.160.162]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:13:50 -0000
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Hiya everyone,
    >
    >Hands up who thinks Richard's views here have any credence whatsoever?
    >Notice the way he uses the term 'we' as though he was personally engaged in
    >the destruction of Afghanistan. If only he was prepared to have an open
    >debate about such issues, but it looks like only fellow Americans are
    >afforded the luxury of not being filtered.
    >
    >Vincent
    >
    I, for one, happen to share them, as do Howard Bloom, Ibn Warraq, Richard Dawkins, Samuel Huntington, and many others,
    >
    >> ----------
    >> From: Richard Brodie
    >> Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 16:35 PM
    >> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >>
    >> <<Slowly, the Bush administration is beginning to see the inconsistencies
    >> and
    >> drawbacks of their actions: yesterday, unidentified Whote House 'sources'
    >> conceded that the US actions in Afghanistan haven't 'won the war on
    >> terrorism.'>>
    >>
    >> Bush said this repeatedly from day one.
    >>
    >> << Next, I hope, will come the recognition that when something
    >> fails, doing it harder is not the answer. And then perhaps there will be a
    >> willingness to think about terrorism intelligently and to design policies
    >> and actions that will defuse it. But I think it will be several months
    >> before we get to this point.>>
    >>
    >> I'm astounded that anyone could consider the battle we just won in
    >> Afghanistan a failure. We killed thousands of enemy soldiers, destroyed
    >> all
    >> their bases, and gathered tons of intelligence. What can you be thinking?
    >>
    >> <<Also, in the category of the Bush administration calming down and coming
    >> to
    >> its senses, it has now conceded that missile attacks from 'rogue states'
    >> are
    >> not the greatest military danger to the US, but that low-grade terrorist
    >> attacks (e.g. trucks a la Oklahoma city) are. Some analysts have been
    >> arguing this for months (and some years) and it is nice to see some
    >> progress.>>
    >>
    >> Second time you've used the word "concede" as if everybody didn't know
    >> this
    >> from day one.
    >>
    >> <<The Bush adminsitration understood little of the
    >> US role internationally, and next to nothing about the Middle East.>>
    >>
    >> With Powell, Rumsfeld, and Bush Sr. in the camp, I doubt there has ever
    >> been
    >> an Administration with better understanding.
    >>
    >>
    >> ===============================================================
    >> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >>
    >>
    >--
    >The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    >charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may
    >be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
    >in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    >person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    >and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    >prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this
    >message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise
    >immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    >for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
    >information in this message that do not relate to the official
    >business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    >given nor endorsed by it.
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 10:06:18 GMT