RE: the earth revolves around the sun

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Wed Jan 16 2002 - 04:07:48 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Modes of Transmission"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA23478 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 16 Jan 2002 04:12:17 GMT
    Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:07:48 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201160407.g0G47mt32338@mail8.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [216.76.255.42]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: the earth revolves around the sun
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > RE: the earth revolves around the sunDate: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 21:23:16 -0500
    > "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Hi Joe Dees -
    >
    >>>The meme is an attempt to express this to someone else.
    >>>
    >>No, the meme is that which is communicated
    >
    >Then, in this scenario, there are three memes. The one that is
    >transmitted- the one that is moving between communicatee and
    >communicator- and the one that is received.
    >
    No, just one meme, translated from its sender's neural storage into encoding behavior (speaking) which is received and retranslated into its receiver's neural storage.
    >
    >In my scenario, there is only one. It's success is determined at how well
    >its behavior is replicated.
    >
    >Your continued examples of responses to stimuli- the bank teller- are
    >communications of meaning, granted, but not all behaviors are memetic, as
    >you say. Not all meanings are meant to be replicated.
    >
    Only meaningless behaviors are nonmemetic; if they have been understood by another, they have been replicated and could possibly be reproduced by the recipient, who becomes the new transmitter. If it cannot be communicated, what proof is there that it possesses meaning (whatever 'it' is, or if 'it' can even BE a 'what' (something)as opposed to anything else - these distinctions are made on the basis of meaning differences).
    >
    >- Wade
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 04:26:00 GMT