Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 15 2002 - 19:48:10 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA22216 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 15 Jan 2002 19:53:01 GMT
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:48:10 -0500
Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: Wade Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3C448348.9452.C7B315@localhost>
Message-Id: <CE13D540-09F0-11D6-922A-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 01:30 , <salice@gmx.net> wrote:

    > Hm so you could also take the "there are different classes of
    > memes"-side.

     From what I've seen of the arguments, that is a reasonable
    stance, if somewhat crowded, like quarks and charm and up and
    down.

    But that matrix works.

    > Ass.

    Like mother said, takes one to know one.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 20:00:08 GMT