Fw: playing at suicide

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 20:28:35 GMT

  • Next message: Steve Drew: "Greetings"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA16249 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 13 Jan 2002 20:26:58 GMT
    Message-ID: <001e01c19c70$fc5b5a00$76a4bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Fw: playing at suicide
    Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 21:28:35 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:19 PM
    Subject: Fw: playing at suicide

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    > To: memetics <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 4:05 PM
    > Subject: Re: playing at suicide
    >
    >
    > > Hi Grant,
    > > I am 4 days behind with my post, so....you wrote,
    > >
    > > > For a loner, you seem to communicate with a lot of people.
    > >
    > > << You can compare this with having a LAT- relationship. I communicate
    > > with the people upon this list and others but I stay on my island, as
    you
    > > put
    > > it. Communicating does not mean to spill out all of your gut feelings.
    > > Don 't get me wrong, I love memetics and I like the discussions, but to
    be
    > > part of a ' group ' is not my cop of tea. I am, from your point of view,
    > and
    > > I understand I am, but it is not with my content.
    > >
    > > But most of the kids I grew up with were not really
    > > > indoctrinated. They just went along with what their parents were
    doing
    > > > because that's what they felt comfortable with. The tribal part came
    > with
    > > > the peers they decided to hang around with.
    > >
    > > << Do you think so !? Are you pretty sure !? You say it in the above,
    not
    > > really indoctinated, but they followed just their parents !? What is the
    > > difference !? Where is your choise in this !? Indoctrination can take
    many
    > > forms.
    > > Did your parents or your grandmother never said not to hang out with
    cer-
    > > tain kind of guys and people !? You can call it, protection if you like,
    > but
    > > deep within you are indoctrinated with all kind of belief- systems. You
    > can
    > > not escape it ! Is the notion not to have sex before marriage a kind of
    > in-
    > > doctrination or a way of protecting you against the hazzards of life !?
    > >
    > > And maybe is it very hard to believe but I do not have a circle of
    > friends,
    > > or a particular friend for that matter. If you call memetics a group
    with
    > a
    > > simular view on evolution than you can call us, me part of a '
    religion',
    > I
    > > have
    > > a particular attitude, it was my choise, but then again, it was '
    forced'
    > > upon
    > > me due to certain cicumstances. This list does have a positive attitude
    > upon
    > > me, I learn a lot, I meet interesting people, but that is not, IMO, as
    > much
    > > as a religious choise ! Please !
    > >
    > > I ain 't gonna say that your point of view is due to the ways where into
    > you
    > > were raised, as much as me, but the difference lies in the way you and I
    > see
    > > the world around us. You were, that can be found in your post, always
    > > surrounded with other people, moreover, you deliberate seeked out, or
    they
    > > searched for you, other guys, to hang out with. I did not !
    > > You were ' indoctrinated ' by the notion of being part of some peer-
    > group,
    > > I was not, I am an individual, due like I said by cicumstances beyond my
    > > control.
    > > The way by which you see how members of societies act is just due to
    that
    > > fact, you think in the ' group ' form, I am more individualistic.
    > >
    > > Everybody, picked out peers who dare to rebel, no matter how you de-
    > > terminate that term. I did too, but after a while I saw the
    imcompleteness
    > > of such a group and lost interest, still.
    > > Religion is not only the practical side of the matter, though.
    > > I live in Belgium, a very old catholic region of the world. Our laws,
    our
    > > rules, behavior, ethics, manners, attitudes, language are packed with
    > > christian dispositions. It is not that I did not attend a catholic
    school
    > > that
    > > I wasn 't indoctrinated with their garbage. We, your daughter, you and I
    > > pick up memes, unconsciously and live by their rules.
    > >
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 13 2002 - 20:33:57 GMT