Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Pieter Bouwer (pbouwer@intekom.co.za)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 13:39:00 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA07450 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:44:50 GMT
    X-vSMTP: intekom.com
    Message-ID: <00ab01c199dc$4eab7980$509cef9b@intekom.co.za>
    From: "Pieter Bouwer" <pbouwer@intekom.co.za>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D1CE@inchna.stir.ac.uk> <5.0.2.1.0.20020110034617.00a39130@mail.clarityconnect.com>
    Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:39:00 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Ray

    May thanks for answering my questions. Your answers to
    questions 1 and 2 made the relationship between 'knowledge' and
    memes very clear. Please look further down for some elucidation
    of question 3.

    > Hi Pieter and welcome,
    >
    > I will take a stab at your questions.
    >
    >
    > At 10:05 AM 1/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
    > >I am new to this list and also, except for a few magazine
    > >articles over the last couple of years, a novice in the field
    of
    > >memetics. My academic background, although somewhat
    antiquated,
    > >covers subjects like Linguistics, Psychology and Education.
    > >
    > >It is possible that you have covered the following questions
    in
    > >the past, in which case I shall appreciate it if you could
    give
    > >me some guidance as to where I can delve in the archives:
    > >
    > >1. Does all knowledge consist of memes or memeplexes?
    >
    > No. Knowledge is a meme only if it is acquired by
    transmission from
    > another organism. Learning about the environment through
    other means does
    > not create memes unless that learning is then transmitted.
    Some on this
    > list would argue that 'knowledge' should not be regarded as a
    meme at all
    > because of problems characterizing what an organism knows.
    For those who
    > follow this rule only 'behaviors' which are acquired from
    organisms are
    > memes. In either case though transmission would be required
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >2. Are all memes received/perceived through sensory
    > >perception?
    > Yes. Since they have to be acquired from others. Some
    internal processes
    > will have to occur during the acquisition process and in fact
    it may be
    > some time after the perceptive event occurs that the meme is
    fully
    > acquired. So for example, someone may show you how to skate
    but you may
    > have to work at it for a while before you can duplicate their
    actions.
    >
    >
    >
    > >3. Is it also possible to acquire memes through
    experience,
    > >where the knowledge is not the direct result of recent
    > >communication?
    >
    > I think I have covered this in 1 and 2.

    Pieter again:

    I did not formulate question 3 properly. I am referring to a
    hypothetical case where somebody allegedly receives knowledge
    'intuitively'. The behaviour resulting from that experience
    looks like a meme, although there is no other organism involved
    in the transmission process. The following could serve as an
    example: Say for instance somebody is totally in the dark as to
    what he/she is to do with regard to the future. He/she goes to
    bed and on awakening the next morning says that he/she
    'intuitively' received an 'answer' during the night. This
    person then acts according to the 'message'. What he/she does
    is in all respects concurrent with something that looks like a
    meme, although there was no organism present in the transmission
    of the meme. One normally observe this kind of behaviour in
    people heavily influenced by religion and/or cult activities.
    It was not a dream, because in a dream there would have been a
    virtual organism communicating with the recipient. The client
    will normally say he/she intuitively 'knew' that it was the
    right thing to do.

    Can this be regarded as a meme? Please be patient with me. I
    am new in this field of study.

    Pieter Bouwer

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 10 2002 - 13:51:50 GMT