Re: playing at suicide

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 06:02:08 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: CRASH CONTAGION"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA01842 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 8 Jan 2002 06:06:10 GMT
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-Id: <AA-5A4E9EC3E3481CAF65BA1BEC4D697288-ZZ@homebase1.prodigy.net>
    Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 01:02:08 -0500
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    Subject: Re: playing at suicide
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    --- Original Message ---
    From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: playing at suicide

    >Kenneth,
    >
    >I find the case of the little boy particularly
    instructive. My own theory
    >on memes is that they are tools used by people to
    accomplish certain goals
    >This is how they are spread and why they are chosen.

    Hi Grant,
    It seems that your theory and mine show remarkable
    overlapping. I do too believe that memes are adopted
    only when deemed valuable or fitness increasing as
    I have put it in one of the hypotheses submitted to
    this list. Cool... (& welcome to the list?)

    Philip.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 08 2002 - 06:12:48 GMT