Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA17131 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 12 Dec 2001 13:10:57 GMT Message-Id: <200112121306.fBCD6Be00212@terri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Definition please Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:06:13 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Kenneth Van Oost -
>Now you are saying that Lamarckism equals creativity !?
Design is lamarckian- although I'd prefer to say that lamarckianism uses
design as a force, which is its mistake.
Design is goal oriented. Evolution is blind to the future.
Design involves patterns. Evolution is chaotic.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Dec 12 2001 - 13:17:19 GMT