Re: Darwinian Processes and Memes in Architecture

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 19:44:53 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Definition please"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA15640 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:27:26 GMT
    Message-ID: <001001c18282$609c4d20$3505bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <3C150896.32609.23C800@localhost>
    Subject: Re: Darwinian Processes and Memes in Architecture
    Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:44:53 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: <salice@gmx.net>
    > Gain does not only mean money. I know that not many on this list
    > share my "memes are dna-slaves" paranoia but i think that's
    > exactly the reason which stands behind.

    Hi Salice,

    I get your point !
    You think that with their article the writers will get some genetic
    advantage !?
    That with their discomfort for Modernism they are trying to get just the
    opposite_ that we would ' return ' to a former state of constructing our
    buil-
    dings and houses !?
    They express a certain appeal for the common good/ for the tradition/ for
    the traits and habits/ for the strict civilian life/ for conventional
    behaviors.
    That in fact, their point of view is a conservative one !?
    Ok, I agree !

    But that must be than broadered, extended as it was an American cultural
    trait ! That is, underneath the broad American democratic themes lies always
    a religious bias. In a way they want to hold on to a certain status quo_
    with
    their article they are trying at least not to expand the thoughts about
    Modernism ! They are trying to contradict by elaborating that this, with
    keeping the things simple, you loose out the complexity of beauty !?
    They are trying to set up a theological revival, that would indeed conjure
    wih what is happening throughout the US of today, but such a proces
    has been started a long time ago_ religion is intertwinted with American
    history.

    Like I said, they made some mistakes, some points do need clarification,
    some issues raised can be applied as points of discussion upon this list,
    but I don 't think that this was all intentional.
    On the other hand, keeping in mind that their memes are dna- slaves, they
    have no other way to write or even think about these things.
    The opposite would be more surprising.....

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 11 2001 - 20:33:47 GMT