RE: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 10:58:40 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: Definition please"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA14861 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:02:31 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation
    Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 05:58:40 -0500
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAIEMLCIAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    Importance: Normal
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    In-Reply-To: <77898B3A-E793-11D5-88AB-003065B4D1F0@wehi.edu.au>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    But John, 'cultural Darwinism' implies that mutation and natural selection
    are the only things at work in cultural evolution. We are in a position, as
    a species, to go beyond that, and some of us use the term 'meme' to refer to
    an element involved in going beyond that. This is why I offer from time to
    time this somewhat different definition: a meme is a langauaged idea/belief,
    embedded of a linguistic architechture that provides it with
    self-disseminating and self-defending properties. This definition allows for
    the possibility that such memes can be consciously designed and launched.

    Cheers, and good progress on the dissertation.
    Lawrence

    > The whole neologism of meme is exactly what Aaron says - a distraction.
    > I would rather we referred to this whole thing as cultural Darwinism (I
    > would have said cultural evolution, but that has too many connotations
    > from the turn of the 20th century), which - if one has read one's
    > Ewald - includes epidemiological models.
    >
    > Aaron, I promise at some unspecified future time to read your essay in
    > detail. Possibly after the PhD thesis is in.
    > --
    > John S Wilkins
    > PhD candidate, species concepts
    > History and Philosophy of Science, jointly with Botany
    > The University of Melbourne, Australia
    > http://www.users.bigpond.com/thewilkins/darwiniana.html
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 11 2001 - 11:08:51 GMT