Re: Definition please

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 13:31:34 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA02209 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:37:15 GMT
Message-Id: <200112041332.fB4DWIQ21904@terri.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Definition please
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:31:34 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 12/04/01 02:08, Joe Dees said this-

    >Actually, spatiotemporality as a single manifold has location, it is just
    >universal (as in everywherewhen in the universe).

    Infinity has a number, it's just all of them....

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Dec 04 2001 - 13:46:03 GMT