RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 03:39:56 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: circular logic"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA23014 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:43:19 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying
    Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:39:56 -0500
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAOEHMCIAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D152@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Vincent, Good question. I like millions of others saw the WTC and Pentagon
    events on TV, on sept 11. As it was, I drove by the Pentagon on the very
    early morning of the 12, and past New York in the afternoon. Seeing it on TV
    was a totally different experience than seeing it in reality. I have thought
    about this and think that it is because I have become used to discounting
    things I see on TV -- fictional stories, etc -- and that I don't have the
    expereince of immeidacy and reality that in-person witnessing has. I was
    very surprised and a bit concerned over the difference between the two
    experiences, and wonder what we are doing to ourselves with our electronic
    brokerage of reality.

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Vincent Campbell
    > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:47 AM
    > To: 'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'
    > Subject: RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying
    >
    >
    > <I don't see your problem anyway. Consider a film as an cultural
    > artefact. In
    > > this film some behavior is shown which can be copied, it's a
    > meme, a meme
    > > found in an cultural artefact. Then - what difference does it
    > make to copy
    > > that
    > > behavior from a film or a from an actual living person in front
    > of me. In
    > > the film there is a physical representation of the form. The behavior is
    > > encoded in it. The same way the behavior is encoded in the
    > movement of the
    > > body of
    > > a actually living person in front of me. So that's the whole difference.
    > > You'd would have to agree with me when say that memes require a physical
    > > representation which i totally agree to. You just fail to see
    > that when we
    > > observe a
    > > behavior we actually observe a physical representation to. The
    > movement of
    > > atoms of a persons body.>
    > >
    > A good one this. There are fundamental differences in our responses
    > to mediated events, as opposed to those we experience directly. Remember
    > film is a 2-D representation in which a lot of information is
    > missing (e.g.
    > touch, taste, smell- unless its smellovision of course :-)), so the
    > information is not encoded in the same way as in a person in front of you,
    > nor can it be decoded in the same way. Hence when army cadets copy their
    > instructors in shooting practice that's legitimate, but someone copying
    > 'Natural Born Killers' is seen as aberrant (and usually seen, wrongly, as
    > the movie's fault, and not the looney's).
    >
    > Consider your responses to images of the WTC attack, I assume most
    > of us witnessed these live on TV as they happened or immediately
    > afterwards.
    > Would your response to these events have been the same/different
    > if you had
    > been there? Similarly our responses to mediated information, inlcuding
    > potential for imitation are not the same as information received more
    > directly. That's not to say that imitation and learning can't come from
    > mediated forms just that these things are different. And it's in the
    > difference that the point lies, for me anyway, whilst others
    > would focus on
    > the similarities.
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 03:55:58 GMT