RE: A Question for Wade

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 03:39:50 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA23009 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:43:18 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: A Question for Wade
    Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 22:39:50 -0500
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAMEHMCIAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    In-Reply-To: <20011128105832.C1499@ii01.org>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Thanks Robin. I think I understand what you are getting at. I have not been
    thinking as accents being relevant to memes (because an accent does not add
    to the content of the communication -- though it might add/detract from its
    communicability). Is an accent part of the 'packaging' of the content?
    Interesting question. Let me think a bit about hits.

    I take your point that a communication once made might not find immediate
    acceptance but achieve it later. The thing that interests me about memes
    (and around which I have built the definition that I use) is precisely this
    matter the communication being taken up and disseminated further. If a meme
    is not taken up when it is expressed, then it would have to have to be
    embedded in some medium that will maintain its presence, until someone comes
    along and takes it up. Thus artifacts, books, etc can be such a
    preservative medium. Bucky Fuller was convinced that the world wasn't ready
    for his ideas and that he would die before it was, so he adopted a strategy
    of embedding his memes in artifacts that reflected the intrinsic logic
    meaning of the memes, in the hope that the artifacts would endure and convey
    their embedded message when society was 'ready.' It is an attractive
    strategy, but I wonder how Bucky might have fared had he been even better at
    languaging his ideas, and especially to do so with the 'masses.'

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Robin Faichney
    > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 5:59 AM
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: A Question for Wade
    >
    >
    > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 04:11:31PM -0500, Lawrence DeBivort wrote:
    > > Scott asks:
    > >
    > > > What's so special about the "meme" term? Why can't we just use "idea",
    > > > "belief", or "concept" to say the same thing? As Ernst Mayr
    > says of the
    > > > meme:
    > > >
    > > > (bq) "It seems to me that this word is nothing but an unnecessary
    > > > synonym of
    > > > the term "concept"." (eq)
    > >
    > > Yes, unfortunately, some have fallen into this too-broad
    > definition of meme.
    > > I prefer to limit 'meme' to refer to those ideas, concepts,
    > beliefs that are
    > > self-disseminating and self-protecting.
    >
    > That's funny, because for me it's too narrow.
    >
    > While a distinction can certainly be drawn between communicated and
    > uncommunicated ideas, I don't see it as very significant, and only in
    > relatively rare situations would what is at one point in time an example
    > of the latter be barred from later being communicated.
    >
    > On the other hand, in a community without linguists or the like, most
    > or all characteristics of the local accent are memes of which noone is
    > ever conscious, ie memes but not ideas, concepts or beliefs. The value
    > of the term meme is that it includes such phenomena.
    >
    > --
    > "The distinction between mind and matter is in the mind, not in matter."
    > Robin Faichney -- inside information -- http://www.ii01.org/
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 03:49:34 GMT