Re: A Question for Wade

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 19:32:16 GMT

  • Next message: salice@gmx.net: "Re: A Question for Wade"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA10948 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 25 Nov 2001 19:37:18 GMT
    Subject: Re: A Question for Wade
    Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 14:32:16 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20011125193214.AAA8649@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.94]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Scott Chase -

    >What's so special about the "meme" term? Why can't we just use "idea",
    >"belief", or "concept" to say the same thing? As Ernst Mayr says of the
    >meme:
    >
    >(bq) "It seems to me that this word is nothing but an unnecessary synonym of
    >the term "concept"." (eq)

    All of which and thus forced me to reconstruct my own thinking and remove
    all farce. The meme is a cultural artifact. Any other usage is erroneous
    and multiplicative.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 25 2001 - 20:11:45 GMT