RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying

From: Lawrence DeBivort (debivort@umd5.umd.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 19:29:39 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA01384 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Nov 2001 19:33:25 GMT
    From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Study shows brain can learn without really trying
    Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 14:29:39 -0500
    Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAOEBHCIAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    In-Reply-To: <20011120165447.A644@ii01.org>
    Importance: Normal
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Robin, I do see memes as beliefs/ideas rather then actions or patterns of
    behavior. Behavior, as I use the term, ids the resultant of several
    activities that take place in the brain, including the operation of beliefs
    there, plus external conditions that limit or encourage specific patterns.
    Does this make sense? Of course, others may define it in other ways. I've
    found this way to be productive of analysis and research, as well as
    practical application.

    Lawrence

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > Of Robin Faichney
    > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:55 AM
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Subject: Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying
    >
    >
    > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 11:25:25PM -0800, Dace wrote:
    > >
    > > We can speak of a proto-culture among primates, or even ants,
    > but it's not
    > > the same as human culture. The elements are there, but it
    > hasn't "come to
    > > life," so to speak. It's the seed, not the tree. Not so
    > different from the
    > > proto-capitalism of antiquity as compared to the true capitalism of
    > > modernity. Memes are only really *memes* when they've
    > germinated under the
    > > heat lamp of human consciousness and, after getting buried,
    > begin to work
    > > their magic. Only then are they carriers of culture. If the
    > replicating
    > > behavior or concept is strictly a function of unreflective
    > mentality, then
    > > it's just biology. There's no need to call it a "meme." Just a simple,
    > > organic habit.
    >
    > Tell me, Ted, where did you get the idea that memes are ideas?
    > As opposed,
    > say, to patterns of behaviour?
    >
    > --
    > "A prime source of meta-memes" -- inside information --
    http://www.ii01.org/
    Robin Faichney

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 20 2001 - 19:39:13 GMT