Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sat Nov 17 2001 - 20:41:18 GMT

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Fw: Study shows brain can learn without really trying"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA28622 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:21:53 GMT
    Message-ID: <001401c16fa8$4b315e40$3f01bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <001001c16c62$3552d3e0$3524f4d8@teddace><01111416482808.01044@storm.berkeley.edu> <003301c16e15$6d314a80$fb24f4d8@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work
    Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 21:41:18 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Dace <edace@earthlink.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:38 PM
    Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work

    Hi Philip, Dace,
    I did not quite follow the discussion between you two, but this sprung out,

    > And what is it, precisely, that's being acknowledged and talked to? Your
    > discussion is predicated on the actuality of some kind of entity that
    > pre-exists the development of the self-plex (ego).

    From my conception of memetics that is not all a strange statement.
    Why can 't the ego, the self- plex not be predicated by some elements,
    entities !?
    In my point of view, memes will do the trick nicely, in the understanding
    of course that memetic information is than already present, before the
    development of the self- plex.
    A kind of a memetic isomorphism, containing fundamental building blocks
    of one character ( memes) can be present long before the development
    of the self- plex itself.
    It rests to be seen how and to what extend that information is used in
    order to built one's self- plex.

    IMO, we can 't exclude the possibility for a kind of entity, whatever
    that might turn out to be. Only memetical speaking of course.

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Nov 19 2001 - 14:35:10 GMT