RE: Fwd: Instinctive speech diminishes us not

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 16:58:59 GMT

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Fwd: Instinctive speech diminishes us not"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA10163 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 9 Nov 2001 17:10:23 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D0FD@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Fwd: Instinctive speech diminishes us not
    Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:58:59 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Physiologically, I thought it was basically all down to the positioning and
    size of the voicebox, which is pretty clear, (although wasn't there
    something recently about deer who have very similar throat structures to
    us?) but the intellectual differences needed for complex communication are
    more difficult to work out- after all we've no genetic information available
    from our immediate ancestors that might indicate the areas of change to
    focus on, only those areas of difference between us and apes.

            <In other words, if language is truly cultural, as a lot of
    hard-nosed
    > should-not-be-academic romantics like us to believe, then there really
    > should not be many physiological differences between humans and primates.>
    >
            Who could you be referring to here? :-)

            I think there's a difference between saying language capability is
    genetic, and the form of language is genetic, e.g. the grammar etc., which
    is what Chomksy argued. I thought that studies of self-invented sign
    language amongst the poor deaf kids of (.... I don't recall where it was),
    showed that their untaught sign languages consisted of grammatical
    structures similar to many languages, had more or less shown Chomsky was
    right? Ot at least was thought to by some.

            PS, to our American friends- can we have our Prime Minister back
    please? We know he's quite liked over there, but it's all gone to hell over
    here whilst he's been playing diplomacy (e.g. the Scottish First Minster
    resigning over a financial scandal; Northern Ireland Assembly members
    shoving each other in an extremely feeble way.

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 09 2001 - 17:16:03 GMT