RE: Memes inside brain

From: Ryan, Angela (ar@ucc.ie)
Date: Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:47:08 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Memes inside brain"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA10601 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:51:42 +0100
    Message-ID: <49AB9D0C6521D84ABD017BF83CDF44C4013F5C09@xch1.ucc.ie>
    From: "Ryan, Angela" <ar@ucc.ie>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Memes inside brain
    Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:47:08 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail3.ucc.ie id f99ClAg07795
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    This comment raises a large number of interesting questions. A comment on
    just one of them; while I don't know what precise information exists, my
    impression is that the passage from oral to written may have been
    experienced as a loss, not necessarily a gain of accuracy of transmission,
    memory being replaced by inscription and as a result, memory becoming less
    reliable. The references I would have in mind here are anecdotal; some Irish
    writers talk about the long and detailed memories of Irish country people in
    the 19th century, 'uncontaminated' by literacy; some fictionalised accounts
    of Classical Greek culture talk of poets fearing the loss of skills
    attendant on the writing down of poetic text, instead of learning them by
    heart, etc. An 18th Gaelic poem Caoineadh Airt Uí Laogheire by Eibhlín Ní
    Chonaill is a transition; while composed from one point of view, it is also
    an inscription of poetic themes and forms which had been 'inscribed orally'
    for hundreds of years before. Very ancient literatures such as Gaelic, Greek
    and Persian seem to have generated text which was re-presented in
    performance, from memory, within the aesthetic limits of elegant form.
    Hypothesis: Is it possible that the advent of written inscription, the
    dissociation of text generation and text transmission though in a linked
    way, was what made what we now call memetics happen - or from another point
    of view, become visible? I have been very interested by points brought up on
    this list to do with cognition and physiology, but not having the background
    to correlate them except superficially to my inquiry, would be grateful for
    any suggestions.
    Yours ever
    Angie

    ar@ucc.ie
    Dr A.M.T. Ryan Agrégée de l'Université,
    Department of French,
    National University of Ireland, Cork,
    Ireland.
    telephone + 353 21 4902552
    facsimile + 353 21 4903284

    -----Original Message-----
    From: dgatherer@talk21.com [mailto:dgatherer@talk21.com]
    Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 5:23 PM
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Memes inside brain

    Angie:
    This message is for me connected to a problem I have been thinking about for
    some time: cultural inscription seems to have moved from oral, to written
    and more recently to audio-visual forms: Irish literature was for example in
    existence on moral-memory form before being written down. What has this
    evolution meant, caused or been caused by, from a memetic point of view?

    Derek:
    It would be easy to surmise that pre-writing narratives would have to be
    less reliably copied from one bardic generation to the next, and thus have a
    faster rate of evolution. But I'm not sure how correct that assumption is,
    as I understand that the Koranic scholars of parts of sub-Saharan Africa
    have preserved their memorised works virtually intact for probably about 400
    years.
    Is there an accepted metric for quantifying the 'distance' between 2 texts?
    Given, say, 7 versions of a narrative epic, could a pairwise distance matrix
    be constructed? How would you handle cases where the plot was essentially
    the same, but the text extensively rewritten? And what about the converse,
    where the text was virtually identical but subtle changes alter the entire
    complexion of the narrative?

    --------------------
    talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at
    http://www.talk21.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 09 2001 - 13:57:15 BST