Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA20114 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:40:18 +0100 From: "salice" <salice@gmx.net> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:33:03 +0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves In-reply-to: <1001778610.3bb5edb26aaf8@rugth1.phys.rug.nl> References: <E15n3vE-0007DX-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk> Message-Id: <E15nOyv-0001q5-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk> Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Blackmore's). However, it is a hard to maintain the viewpoint
> that memes are slaves of genes or vice versa, as the
> co-evolution has somewhat flatted down or perhaps is slowly
> reversing (now this *is* my hypothesis, posted some 2 months ago).
well i agree.
i just found it annoying reading things like meme were enemies of dna
or they had a different independent evolution. i also believe that
dna and memes influence each other but i don't think that they work
against eachother.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 29 2001 - 19:45:30 BST