RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves

From: Philip Jonkers (P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 17:15:33 BST

  • Next message: salice: "RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA19923 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 29 Sep 2001 17:21:58 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>
    X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves
    Message-ID: <1001780133.3bb5f3a5c9993@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <E15n6Kw-0000sr-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk>
    In-Reply-To: <E15n6Kw-0000sr-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6
    X-Originating-IP: 129.125.13.3
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Quoting salice <salice@gmx.net>:

    >
    > > What scale would explain coming to the aid of a whale or other wild
    > animal
    > > in distress? I watched a program recently where a whale was in
    > distress and
    > > a bunch of people got together to help it and it was then sent to a
    > water
    > > park for rehabilitation. *Why* (in the evolutionary sense of the word)
    > would
    > > someone consider the plight of sea turtles a serious concern? Would
    > > inclusive fitness or reciprocal altruism fit the bill here?
    >
    > i dont know on dna-level, maybe these
    > people share some genes with the distressed whale. they could also
    > get money from tourists in the water park. on the meme level i mean
    > you saw them on tv, if they wouldnt have saved the whale you wouldnt
    > have seen them. it's just some kind of humor. but it makes you think
    > so there's some meme business happening no matter how stupid it
    > looks.
    >
    > i dont know like many people feel sad when they see a dead bird on
    > the street but have no problem killing spiders or other insects.
    > maybe there is some dependence or just cultural learned belief.

    It's likely we share more than 30-40 percent with any mammal.
    Yet it doesn't prevent us from slaying cows and sheep. Why?
    They don't genetically overlap with our genes enough to
    recognize them as genetic soul-mates.
    We want food, therefore we kill `em.
    Hell, there are scores of people killing (or eating) other
    people who have 99.9 % over their genes in common!

    The key words needed to describe the above charitable actions,
    I maintain, is interspecific altruism brought about by and for
    culture. See my previous postings...

    Philip.

     

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 29 2001 - 17:27:07 BST