Re: Dawkins was right all along

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2001 - 23:21:46 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA01073 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 22 Sep 2001 23:27:27 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.143]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 18:21:46 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F308mHy3pt6YK5F1awT00018355@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Sep 2001 22:21:47.0225 (UTC) FILETIME=[F7B76490:01C143B4]
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along
    >Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 09:59:28 +0100
    >
    >On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:55:26PM -0400, Scott Chase wrote:
    > >
    > > I thought objectivity
    > > entailed not taking a normative stance on what you study or at least
    > > approaching what you study in a more balanced manner.
    >
    >Of course! But you don't need to study what you already know is all
    >wrong!
    >
    I assume that various mythlogies have no truth to them, yet I think given
    oodles of reading time that studying these mythologies would be well worth
    the time, especially while applying the comparative method (and trying to
    steer clear of the Jungians ;-))
    >
    >It's very like the common response to terrorism: you don't study bad
    >things, you eliminate them!
    >
    > > I've seen some
    > > anti-religious sentiment focusing on the negatives.
    >
    >Isn't that what it's supposed to do? :-)
    >
    > > BTW, I'm trying to figure out what distorting sentiments of religion are
    > > creeping in to bias my *agnostic* views.
    >
    >Sure you're not taking the concept of balance to extremes??
    >
    >
    Maybe so. Modderation is good only in moderation. I've found myself watching
    political shows and getting ticked of at both the Republican and Democrat
    guests. I've wound up *really* ticked off. It's a treacherous journey
    between Scylla and Charybdis.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 22 2001 - 23:32:22 BST