RE: Logic

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 26 2001 - 12:12:26 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Logic"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA12906 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:49:18 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745FCD@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Logic
    Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 12:12:26 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <Sorry, but no for you too Wade. Evolution might not be
    > perfectly logical with respect to a perfect intelligent
    > design, but it is logical the some degree nonetheless.
    > Also it does `separate wheat from the chaff' if I correctly
    > understand your niche. Natural selection means specific
    > adaptation. A species adapts or perishes. During the competition
    > between species only the fittest survive.>
    >
            How come there are millions of species then, that cohabit the same
    environments? How come there isn't just one species? Survival of the
    fittest is a tautology which doesn't adequately describe what goes on in
    evolution. (Why? think about what it means to be fit- of course only the
    fit survive).

            Some species are able to exploit niches in ways which allow then to
    survive despite dramatic environmental change going on around them (the
    coelacanth, and nautilus spring to mind), others become so tied to their
    niches that they are extremely vulnerable to sudden enviromental change
    (giant panda I guess is a good example).

            <Therefore, natural selection does function as a sieve to separate
    wheat from chaff.
    > We humans wouldn't be around, being intelligent, on top of
    > the food chain and all that, if it weren't for natural selection!
    > Of all the macro-species, humans came out as winners in the
    > rat-race called biological evolution.>
    >
            Another basic error is to see evolution as a kind of a ladder, with
    species fighting each other to get to the top of it, and with us on top. It
    is not like that. If it was, then humans could not be wiped out by bacteria
    or viruses because they are so much further "down the ladder".

    Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 26 2001 - 12:53:31 BST