Re: The Guardian on Information

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Jun 23 2001 - 04:06:46 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: The Guardian on Information"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA11712 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 23 Jun 2001 04:04:03 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:06:46 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: The Guardian on Information
    Message-ID: <3B33C176.25503.7F2797@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010622204815.A685@ii01.org>
    References: <20010622142844.AAA24323@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:28:33AM -0400
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 22 Jun 2001, at 20:48, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:28:33AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > > On 06/21/01 14:53, Robin Faichney said this-
    > >
    > > >Here's a quote from it:
    > >
    > > Here's another-
    > >
    > > >Differentiation came into the universe, creating a pattern that
    > > >required information.
    > >
    > > How anything, at all, ever, could 'require' information, is beyond
    > > me.
    >
    > I suspect that particular writer has an imperfect understanding of the
    > issue. The pattern _is_ the information. Or, at least, the pattern
    > requires the concept of information for it to be fully understood.
    >
    > > What patterns _are_ created through the elemental and primal forces
    > > of the big bang, by definition, can be analyzed to _provide_
    > > information (to information-using entities), but the processes of
    > > this creation and even the patterns themselves in no way _require_
    > > any information.
    > >
    > > Perhaps I'm lost, but this classification of information as a
    > > necessary and sufficient property of the universe seems specious to
    > > me.
    >
    > Think "structure". Information theory in physics is the treatment of
    > structure as an element in itself.
    >
    What is necessary is matter and energy in pattern, structure or
    configuration. Awarenesses become informed concerning such
    patterns, structures or configurations, and their attributes, via
    perception and/or cognition. Information cannot precede
    awareness, for it is necessary for an awareness to become
    informed concerning a configuration, for information, a
    communication of configuration to an awareness via perception, to
    exist.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Inside Information -- http://www.ii01.org -- "a prime source of
    > meta-memes"
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 04:08:02 BST