RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue May 01 2001 - 11:10:07 BST

Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Baby Not Crawling? Reason Seems to Be Less Tummy Time"

Previous message: Scott Chase: "RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science (another long post)"
Maybe in reply to: Lawrence DeBivort: "The Status of Memetics as a Science"
Reply: Chris Taylor: "Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA15999 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 1 May 2001 11:13:49 +0100
Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745E25@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 11:10:07 +0100 
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

Aesthetically, many cathedrals are impressive and beautiful (I quite liked
Scare-coeur myself when I visited it), but I can't help thinking about the
cost in labour and monetary terms that kept generations of people in
serfdom.

Vincent

> ----------
> From: Scott Chase
> Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:40 pm
> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
> >Subject: RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science
> >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 14:35:56 +0100
> >
> > <Without religion you wouldn't have Bach's music.>
> >
> > I don't think Bach makes up for the Inquisition.
> >
> >
> Now there's a contrast. We have the gamut from the wondrous beauty of
> religious art and architecture to the horrid application of religious
> dogma.
> Mostly, I'd assume, religious activity occupies points betwixt the two
> extremes, but some of the music (Gregorian and Buddhist chants for
> example)
> and artistic productions (stained glass, statues and temples) should be
> given their due.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Baby Not Crawling? Reason Seems to Be Less Tummy Time"
Previous message: Scott Chase: "RE: The Status of Memetics as a Science (another long post)"
Maybe in reply to: Lawrence DeBivort: "The Status of Memetics as a Science"
Reply: Chris Taylor: "Re: The Status of Memetics as a Science"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 01 2001 - 11:17:15 BST