Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA22945 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:57:37 +0100 Subject: Re: Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 16:53:48 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010422205348.AAA22623@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.127]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Trupeljak Ozren -
>>Science will not move without evidence for perception.
>What does that mean?
Mechanisms, mostly. Proofs.
Otherwise -
>Semantics?
- probably....
>As for anecdotes, beliefs and other fictions, try talking to a good
>creationist researcher
'Creationist researcher' is, of course, an oxymoron. They are literally
deniers of facts, and not discoverers of any.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 22 2001 - 22:00:54 BST