RE: Determinism

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Apr 17 2001 - 20:57:33 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: analog computing = useless hypothesis"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA08784 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 17 Apr 2001 20:54:58 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:57:33 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: RE: Determinism
    Message-ID: <3ADC59DD.20908.368CBD@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745DA0@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 17 Apr 2001, at 14:29, Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > If we're talking films for philosophers, then someone suggested to me
    > that Terrance Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' was, for them, about as
    > close as you'll get to Heidegger on film. I kinda saw what they
    > meant...
    >
    > Seems to me to be a film, in its treatment of individuals responses to
    > events, that isn't irrelevant to this discussion.
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    It reminded me of MAN'S FATE, a brilliant novel of the Chinese
    revolution by Andre Malraux.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 17 2001 - 20:58:08 BST