Re: Is Suicide Contagious? A Case Study in Applied Memetics

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Apr 15 2001 - 00:00:54 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: The Tipping Point"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA01349 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:58:17 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:00:54 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Is Suicide Contagious? A Case Study in Applied Memetics
    Message-ID: <3AD89056.20535.51406B@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010414101154.A979@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <07c301c0c45c$f4ca2e20$235c2a42@jrmolloy>; from jr@shasta.com on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:01:45PM -0700
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 14 Apr 2001, at 10:11, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:01:45PM -0700, J. R. Molloy wrote:
    > > From: "Robin Faichney" <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    > > > So analog computing is a proposal intended to explain certain
    > > > facts or observations?
    > >
    > > No, I don't think so, and I'm surprised that you could come up with
    > > such a conclusion.
    >
    > It follows directly from your claim that analog computing is an
    > hypothesis.
    >
    > > (Actually, I suspect you're being deliberately obstinate, but it
    > > doesn't really matter.)
    >
    > Actually, I'm not.
    >
    > > There is no such thing as an "analog computer" and hypothesizing
    > > such an imaginary structure is a useless waste of time.
    >
    > I've seen at least one, that I can remember clearly, with my own eyes.
    > Of course, you might be using these words in some strange way so that
    > for you there's no such thing as a "real" analog computer, regardless
    > of what's been done with the devices so labelled. In which case this
    > becomes an issue of individual psychology, and I wouldn't wish to
    > pursue it.
    >
    > > The little list of useless hypotheses is a way to help folks avoid
    > > wasting time and resources on these dead ends.
    >
    > I'm impressed. Your arrogance rivals that of Joe Dees.
    >
    But fails to even distantly approach Robin Faichney's.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 15 2001 - 00:03:49 BST