Re: Determinism

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Apr 12 2001 - 00:59:30 BST

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: memes- remember them?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA23317 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 12 Apr 2001 01:03:33 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.220.143]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:59:30 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F147Yf0scL9NtDEJmGz00005986@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2001 23:59:30.0325 (UTC) FILETIME=[72A67450:01C0C2E3]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Determinism
    >Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:35:33 -0500
    >
    >On 9 Apr 2001, at 16:05, Robin Faichney wrote:
    >
    > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:13:54AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Of course, the explanation for step two (as in that famous comic)
    > > > that they do use is "then a miracle occurs" which is the
    > > > time-honored hand-wave of the theologically biased.
    > >
    > > Now what does that remind me of? I know -- "top-down causation"! :-)
    > >
    >Miracles are then predicted and observed every day in PET-scan
    >labs all over the world. Some would call it science.
    > > --
    >
    >
    Please elaborate on how "top-down causation" has been demonstrated by P.E.T.

    Would the entity which constitutes the "top" itself emerge from something
    that is indeed below? Could this "top" be subject to reduction?

    I could envision a so-called "top" element stemming from other elements
    projecting causal arrows into it from below and itself sending causal arrows
    downward to other elements, but a full-blown "top" element not derived from
    other ements would have came into existence out of thin air now wouldn't it?
    In essence the "top" decomposes into lower level elements. Whatver emerges
    from the lower levels would be responsible for influencing other lower level
    ememnt, which is the same as saying lower level elemnts communicate through
    an elaborate causal web (or nexus) to influence other lower level elements.

    Would "top-down causation" thus vaporize upon closer inspection?

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 12 2001 - 01:06:34 BST