Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA16983 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:51:39 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:39:47 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Determinism Message-ID: <20010409183947.A685@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <013f01c0bd6b$21682e80$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; <3AD133AA.6664.BBCD42@localhost> <00ca01c0c113$29cfd680$5eaefea9@rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <00ca01c0c113$29cfd680$5eaefea9@rcn.com>; from agassi@erols.com on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:36:01PM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:36:01PM -0400, Aaron Agassi wrote:
>
> > Which is quite strange, considering that objectivity is unattainable;
> > the best we can do is intersubjective agreement.
>
> Never the less, we still seek to improve our knowledge of truth
> (correspondence to reality). And besides subjectivity, there is also
> relativity. And the question remains whether subjective freedom is illusory
> or simply relative to the subjective frame of reference, thus as objectively
> real as superdeterminism, globally.
What does "relative to the subjective frame of reference" mean?
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 18:55:56 BST