Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA06940 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:41:56 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:23:06 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Determinism -- the brain is not enough Message-ID: <20010405182306.A804@reborntechnology.co.uk> References: <Pine.WNT.4.21.0104052027420.169-100000@C157775-A.frndl1.wa.home.com> <3ACCA2E7.7CA70232@bioinf.man.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <3ACCA2E7.7CA70232@bioinf.man.ac.uk>; from Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:52:55PM +0100 From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 05:52:55PM +0100, Chris Taylor wrote:
> TJ Olney wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I don't. I think it requires a larger neural structure with sense
> > organs. I don't think a brain in a bottle with no external interfaces could
> > manifest a mind. I remind you of some strange things like the surface of the
> > intestines having a neural density about the same as the cranium.
>
> OK, I'll accept the wider definition, but the core of this is whether
> funny quantum stuff is required to generate the necessary complexity.
It'd be a bit difficult to eliminate it, wouldn't it?
-- Robin Faichney Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 05 2001 - 18:47:59 BST