Re: Determinism

From: Aaron Agassi (agassi@erols.com)
Date: Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:13:16 BST

  • Next message: Aaron Agassi: "Re: Determinism"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA00104 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:18:17 +0100
    Message-ID: <010601c0bd19$c6e803a0$5eaefea9@rcn.com>
    From: "Aaron Agassi" <agassi@erols.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D60@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Determinism
    Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:13:16 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Vincent Campbell" <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 8:25 AM
    Subject: RE: Determinism

    > >> Why does perfect knowledge negate freedom?
    >
    > <More precisely, perfect knowledge would negate choice. Because the
    > more one
    > > knows, this tends to narrow one's choices. -Down to the one optimal
    > > decision, given adequate knowledge. And perfect knowledge would
    certainly
    > > be
    > > adequate!>
    > >
    > I'm not sure I follow this, maybe I'm missing something.
    >
    > Surely the closer to perfect knowledge one gets the greater the
    > freedom- the greater the choices? This stems from the increased capacity
    of
    > understanding causal relationships, and thus our ability to manipulate
    them
    > to our own ends (men on the moon and all that...).
    >
    > Vincent
    >
    No, just the opposite:

    The less you know, the more options may seem viable. But the more one knows,
    the more choices are eliminated, because it becomes clear that they would
    not achieve the desired outcome. if one had perfect knowledge, there would
    always be only one optimum decision in ever circumstance. No range of
    choice.
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 16:21:32 BST