Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA29052 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:28:55 +0100 Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D60@inchna.stir.ac.uk> From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Determinism Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:25:19 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>> Why does perfect knowledge negate freedom?
<More precisely, perfect knowledge would negate choice. Because the
more one
> knows, this tends to narrow one's choices. -Down to the one optimal
> decision, given adequate knowledge. And perfect knowledge would certainly
> be
> adequate!>
>
I'm not sure I follow this, maybe I'm missing something.
Surely the closer to perfect knowledge one gets the greater the
freedom- the greater the choices? This stems from the increased capacity of
understanding causal relationships, and thus our ability to manipulate them
to our own ends (men on the moon and all that...).
Vincent
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 04 2001 - 13:31:42 BST