Re: Memetic Paradigms

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun Apr 01 2001 - 11:29:46 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA14850 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:27:26 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 05:29:46 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Memetic Paradigms
    Message-ID: <3AC6BCCA.30392.2DA723B@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010401103128.C973@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3AC602EF.1837.3B4204@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:16:47PM -0600
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 1 Apr 2001, at 10:31, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 04:16:47PM -0600, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > Obviously, a gene for brown eyes cannot manifest in the absence > of
    > a head growing, but it does not matter how many legs one has > (or
    > have you stared in the Buddha-nature eyes of a dog lately?). > We can
    > indeed tell what the codon boundaries of particular genes > are, and
    > can isolate and correlate them in the laboratory; that's > what the
    > Human Genome Project has been doing for the last > decade. Have you
    > kept up with ANYTHING scientific in the last 20 > years, or do you
    > restrict yourself to eastern religion and empty > rhetoric?
    >
    > Ignoring your rhetoric, it's now clear that by "isolable atom" you
    > don't mean genes can survive on their own. Despite what you might
    > think, that was *not* clear previously. (And the sheer silliness of
    > the idea is not good enough reason to rule it out as something you
    > might say.)
    >
    The 'isolable' distinction between genes and memes is made in the
    tenth essay of DARWINIZING CULTURE: THE STATUS OF
    MEMETICS AS A SCIENCE - A Well-Disposed Social
    Anthropologist's Problems With Memes, by Maurice Bloch. My
    suggestion of the memes-as-species paradigm was intended to
    counter his objections.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 01 2001 - 11:30:05 BST