Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:11:30 BST

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Memetic Paradigms"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA13675 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:09:09 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:11:30 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <3AC601B2.15077.366E01@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010331142902.B478@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <3AC47FB0.25304.D0FEE@localhost>; from joedees@bellsouth.net on Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:44:32PM -0600
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 31 Mar 2001, at 14:29, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 12:44:32PM -0600, joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > > On 30 Mar 2001, at 13:54, Robin Faichney wrote: > > > > So does this
    > mean than when I look at you you are a part of my > > > identity? > >
    > > > Your view of me is, yes. > > > But, according to you, Douglas HAS
    > no identity, and neither does > anyone else.
    >
    > That's your interpretation of my view, and it says more about you than
    > about me.
    >
    > > > > What is the effect on your identity of having been looked at?
    > > >
    > > > Absolutely none. If I think I'm being looked at, then that
    > > > thought is obviously part of me.
    > > >
    > > it can't be part of nothing, can it?
    >
    > If you had a little more self-awareness you wouldn't post while so
    > wound-up, because you just make yourself look stupid. (Which you are,
    > in fact, while wound-up.)
    >
    The logical consequences of your position are the logical
    consequences of your position; tautologically trivial, yet
    nevertheless true. I realize that it may be personally painful and
    embarassing for you to be publicly confronted with consequences
    which you never devoted yourself to reasoning out privately, but
    perhaps such a smack with the cane of logic can lead you to your
    own enlightenment, grasshopper - or perhaps in your case, such
    an understanding is conceptually impossible.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 23:11:50 BST