Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: LJayson@aol.com
Date: Sat Mar 31 2001 - 15:04:04 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA12633 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:08:24 +0100
    From: <LJayson@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <21.995387e.27f73dd4@aol.com>
    Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:04:04 EST
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Type:  multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_21.995387e.27f73dd4_boundary"
    Content-Disposition:  Inline
    X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10523
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Len:
    >Could we therefore say that one man's enlightenment is another man's
    >endarkment?

    Lloyd wrote:
    >I agree with Len's statement but would broaden it. Each memeplex has it's
    >own term for "endarkment". For Christianity it is sin. For Buddhists it is
    >delusion. Each memeplex defines its endarkment term in a way that
    >essentially means: not accepting the faith. This means revising definitions
    >to fit dogma. Thus "enlightment" to a Buddhist means something different
    >from what the term meant during Europe's "Age of Enlightenment". "Delusion"
    >to a Buddhist means something different from what it means in mainstream
    >psychology.

    >I am not sure how your term, "endarkment", might apply to non-religious
    >memeplexi. I suppose, at a personal level, it might have to to do with
    >anything that creates cognitive dissonance in the self. At the level of
    >science it might have something to do with not knowing or deliberately non
    >knowing. Feminist researchers in my country, for example, exposed male
    >domestic violence while witholding those results of their research that
    >showed that women, in domestic situations, were just as violent as the men
    >studied. Possibly this was seen as "enlightened" in feminist circles but in
    >scientific circles it would be seen as unethical.

    >I apologize for rambling. Interesting question.

    Len:
    Not rambling in the least; extremely well stated.

    Len Jayson

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 31 2001 - 15:11:05 BST