Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 28 2001 - 19:59:46 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA12968 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:19:04 +0100
    Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:59:46 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <20010328195946.E11214@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D29@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D29@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:21:55AM +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:21:55AM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    >
    > <In terms of sheer numbers of racists, what proportion do you think
    > would
    > > be swayed either way by genetic arguments? Don't make the mistake of
    > > thinking everyone is like you, a thorough-going rationalist. I'd bet the
    > > vast majority of racists are happy to assume the "others" to be inferior,
    > > without caring much about any fact or pseudo-fact. These people have
    > > psychological problems that no amount of rationalisation will affect.
    > > It's just like any other ingrained prejudice.>
    > >
    > Is it any better to try and change racists minds by irrational
    > means?

    Is psychology irrational?

    I always did suspect that those who are always trumpeting rationality
    don't appreciate psychology.

    > > Less credibility among whom? If they're racists,
    > > they're unlikely to care. If they're not racists, such views wouldn't
    > > have much credibility for them anyway.>
    > >
    > Social credibility- in other words what, collectively as a society,
    > we regard as credible viewpoints around which to organise ourselves. A bit
    > like Rousseau's general will.

    Sounds very airy-fairy to me, but this is rather peripheral to my main
    interests, and I don't want to pursue it.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 28 2001 - 20:34:22 BST