Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 27 2001 - 11:47:47 BST

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA06437 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:45:19 +0100
    Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:47:47 +0100
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <20010327114747.B1417@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D1D@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D1D@inchna.stir.ac.uk>; from v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:45:17AM +0100, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    > >
    > What I mean is you must have some way to test different value
    > judgements against each other. Only science, of the different approaches we
    > have to this kind of dilemma, offers the hope of a testing process which may
    > be value free (note the qualifications here).

    Science is, indeed, value free. That's why we need something other than
    science to help us handle values.

    > >> Otherwise you end up either in a fence-sitting position refusing
    > to judge
    > > >> anything, and thus unable to act, or you must end up with a cultural
    > > >> relativism where anything goes, and everything is of equal merit-
    > > whether
    > > >> that be meditation or mass human sacrifice.
    > >
    > <Maybe you could explain how such laudable values (or any others)
    > can be
    > > derived from science.>
    > >
    > I think the emphasis should be the other way round- why should
    > anyone derive their values from any belief system which eschews empirical
    > testing?

    This is about "could", not "should". I claim you can't derive values
    from science. Regardless of the desireability of deriving them from
    anything else. Now show me how you can.

    > Science is explicitly about this, hence its capacity to, at least
    > potentially, resolve disputes.

    It can resolve disputes about facts, not those about values.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 27 2001 - 12:47:50 BST