Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA00164 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 26 Mar 2001 05:13:44 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [24.26.114.9] From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:10:09 -0500 Content-Type: text/html Message-ID: <F8A91E9GQvnbEG10Gai0000f7c0@hotmail.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Mar 2001 04:10:09.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5C60620:01C0B5AA] Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>
The presentation of scientific topics in textbooks and popularizations goes well with props. Think of the pictures of peppered moths against different backgrounds in biology texts or the visual representations of molecular structure in organic chemistry texts. I forked out some money for one of those plastic stick figure kits so I could marvel over ring structures.
Some diagrams are less representative of reality than others. The infamous depictions of vertebrate embryos portrayed by Haeckel come to mind. He overstated the case for early similarity and the creationists won't ever let us forget it.
All one needs for props in memetics is a puppet and the strings controlled by someone wearing a t-shirt with "memeplex" silkscreened on the front.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 26 2001 - 05:16:14 BST