Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: wilkins (wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 22:48:07 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA17341 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:53:37 GMT
    Message-ID: <3ABA8127.B0BD9BB4@wehi.edu.au>
    Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:48:07 +1100
    From: wilkins <wilkins@wehi.EDU.AU>
    Organization: The Walter & Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-CCK-MCD  (Macintosh; U; PPC)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745D02@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------B09B5AFD14FA9CD112BF85C9"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Vincent Campbell wrote:
    >
    > Yes, but Galileo's life was at stake over the principles which he troubled
    > over sticking to, but he did so in the end.
    >
    > Professional death can be another risk- like that bloke who came up with
    > continental drift, or Alvarez's catastrophism theory over the dinosaurs
    > extinction- but such people stick to to their theories, and those who turn
    > out to be right we celebrate their determination, those who turn out to
    > bewrong we condemn their obstinacy.

    *Professional* death, sure. That is the death (or non-proliferation) of
    memes. This is entirely within the model as proposed by Hull (and to a
    less-acceptable extent from a memetic perspective, Kuhn) of scientific
    evolution. But none of the examples so far adduced shows the death of
    anyone for scientific memes.
    >
    > Then of course there's Scopes monkey trial.

    Nobody died, or even went to jail. And that was about a religious set of
    memes, not scientific ones (anyone actually *seen* that textbook? It's
    on the web somewhere in a law school site (search on Scopes trial). Not
    exactly science so much as a triumphalist faith in progress. More
    neo-Lamarckian than Darwinian.

    -- 
    John Wilkins, Head, Communication Services, The Walter and Eliza Hall 
    Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
    Homo homini aut deus aut lupus - Erasmus of Rotterdam
    <http://www.users.bigpond.com/thewilkins/darwiniana.html>
    Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="wilkins.vcf"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Content-Description: Card for wilkinsContent-Disposition: attachment; filename="wilkins.vcf"
    
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 22 2001 - 22:56:07 GMT