Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA13498 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:25:56 GMT Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 07:21:55 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010322122152.AAA13805@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.87]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Robin Faichney -
>So is my claim about how I feel scientific or not?
Yes, it is.
>Ethical systems are no more memetic than is science.
This however, loses me. If science is an observation without judgment,
how can the basis of judgment, ethics, be similar?
The facts (science) need to come first, and there are no facts in ethics
(judgments).
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 22 2001 - 12:31:20 GMT