Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Robin Faichney (robin@reborntechnology.co.uk)
Date: Wed Mar 21 2001 - 10:03:57 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA07989 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:24:47 GMT
    Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:57 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    Message-ID: <20010321100357.A11003@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010321012144.AAA27991@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.85]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
    In-Reply-To: <20010321012144.AAA27991@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.85]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:21:45PM -0500
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 08:21:45PM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    >
    > Science, to me, and I will and would need a terrific force to move me
    > from this mountain, is the way to find what is, and no meme, possibly
    > even no language, is required to find a working element of nature.

    Memes are required to represent reality -- every scientific theory, no
    matter how well or badly supported by experiment, is a memeplex.

    > And whatever wants to find one, can. I would contend that the memeless
    > 'eureka' state, is required, and that is what science is to me- this
    > discovery, and I really, really, don't think discovery is possible with a
    > meme in the way.

    Theories -- memeplexes -- are required to suggest potentially fruitful
    avenues of exploration, and to interpret the results when they come.
    You don't mention experimentation once. I think you're confusing
    personal insight with scientific discovery. The two can overlap,
    as in the original "eureka", but they're different things. One is of
    primarily personal significance, and private, the other is of universal
    significance, and must be shared to be validated.

    Science is not "out there". To think that is to confuse it with reality,
    which in fact exists whether anyone is studying it or not. Science is a
    set of memeplexes that, ideally, reflect reality exactly, but in practice
    are always vulnerable to being found imperfect.

    -- 
    Robin Faichney
    Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 21 2001 - 10:27:12 GMT