Re: The Demise of a Meme

From: Brent Silby (phil066@it.canterbury.ac.nz)
Date: Wed Mar 21 2001 - 02:47:37 GMT

  • Next message: Gatherer, D. (Derek): "RE: The Demise of a Meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA07092 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 21 Mar 2001 03:10:58 GMT
    Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:47:37 +1200
    From: Brent Silby <phil066@it.canterbury.ac.nz>
    Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-id: <002a01c0b1b3$b12db940$25d910ac@oemcomputer>
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
    Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_xHnVocGTUskXC0Q2HtHIjQ)"
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-priority: Normal
    References: <3AB7A34E.31712.C00AEB@localhost>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    Joe Dees wrote:"The memes do not 'build' a mind per se so
    much as determine what kind of architecture will adorn an
    otherwise simple and barren, yet pre-existent house"

    Find a brain that has not encountered society or language and see what sort of mind it contains. I would imagine that such a mind would be devoid of any of the qualities that we like to call "human".

    Brent.
    ------------------------
    Brent Silby 2001
    Memetics Research
    and Engineering Project

    [Feel free to visit my sites]
    [BasePage]: http://www.geocities.com/brent_silby
    [Collective Intelligence]:
    http://globeclubs.theglobe.com/the_collective-L/list.taf

    Room 601a
    Department of Philosophy
    University of Canterbury
    Email: b.silby@phil.canterbury.ac.nz
    __________________________________________

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: joedees@bellsouth.net
      To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
      Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:37 PM
      Subject: Re: The Demise of a Meme

      On 21 Mar 2001, at 11:59, Brent Silby wrote:

    > Richard wrote:"Memetic selection and purposive design are by no means
    > mutually exclusive."
    >
    > I guess it depends on what you take "purposive design" to mean. If by
    > "purposive design" you mean the evolution of ideas through the
    > interaction with existing memes, then you could be right.
    >
      And also with the innate tendencies, strengths and weaknesses
      with which we, as unique, non-tabula-rasa individuals, are both
      blessed and cursed to be born, as well as the sometimes
      counterintuitive choices we make which experientially tend to belie
      the caught-in-a-machine lockstep stance of superdeterminism, as if
      complexity theory had not already been enough to blow that
      abstract ideality out of the concretely real water of experience.
    >
    > My hesitation in using terminology like "design", "creative",
    > "purposive" is that it sort of removes a feature of the human mind
    > from the memetic equation. In doing this you end up with the
    > following picture: on the one hand you have a bunch of memes that
    > inhabit the mind -- or more precisely, build a mind. While on the
    > other hand you have some part of the mind that is separate and can
    > "direct" the activity of the memes.
    >
      C'mon, Brent; 'mind' and 'soul' are not the same thing; mind does
      not possess an existence independent of the generating physical
      substrate mind from which it emerges. Mind is not metaphysical,
      but very much physical. The mind, which has its form (self-
      conscious awareness) filled with experiential content can
      nevertheless consider that content when deciding whether or not to
      accept a further meme. They (form and content) are two
      interrelated, mutually correlating and mutually grounding sides of
      the single human coin. The memes do not 'build' a mind per se so
      much as determine what kind of architecture will adorn an
      otherwise simple and barren, yet pre-existent house. The
      architecture will, of course, to a great measure determine the
      purposes to which the house can be put, but if one's house is, say,
      genetically mathematics-deficient, no amount of building upon it
      (education) will stick; the added structures will simply fall away,
      and the rubble will prove insufficient for the person to teach
      graduate-level number theory.
    >
    > I prefer to think of the memetic process as self explanatory, not
    > requiring the interference of a mind that is somehow removed from the
    > equation.
    >
      But the mind, the dynamically recursive patterning that emerges
      from the physical substrate brain, is NOT removed from the
      equation, but inextricably intertwined within it. Sperryian top-down
      control is a PET-scan verified scientific fact, conscious self-
      awareness is logically prior to the ability to symbolically represent
      referents, and they are both prior to the capacity to freely and self-
      awarely choose between competing memes.
    >
    > Brent.
    > ------------------------
    > Brent Silby 2001
    > Memetics Research
    > and Engineering Project
    >
    > [Feel free to visit my sites]
    > [BasePage]: http://www.geocities.com/brent_silby
    > [Collective Intelligence]:
    > http://globeclubs.theglobe.com/the_collective-L/list.taf
    >
    > Room 601a
    > Department of Philosophy
    > University of Canterbury
    > Email: b.silby@phil.canterbury.ac.nz
    > __________________________________________
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Richard Brodie
    > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:22 AM
    > Subject: RE: The Demise of a Meme
    >
    >
    > Brent wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > << Crafted? I'm not sure if that is the best word to use, as it
    > implies purposive design. But, of course, scientific memes were not
    > "designed", they are the result of natural memetic selection. It is
    > accidental that science, or any other memeplex, is comprised of its
    > collection of memes. It could have been a lot different -- in fact
    > it has been during certain periods of history. Its just that
    > science's current range of memes happen to be more successful
    > self-replicators than some of their competing memes.>>
    >
    >
    >
    > Memetic selection and purposive design are by no means mutually
    > exclusive.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com www.memecentral.com
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >

      ===============================================================
      This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
      Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
      For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
      see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 21 2001 - 03:14:55 GMT