Re: Toggling nature's auto-erase

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu Mar 15 2001 - 19:37:33 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Toggling nature's auto-erase"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA20615 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:34:49 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:37:33 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Toggling nature's auto-erase
    Message-ID: <3AB0C59D.12615.ED1A9@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <20010315154338.A632@reborntechnology.co.uk>
    References: <20010315121703.AAA25685@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.34]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:17:03AM -0500
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 15 Mar 2001, at 15:43, Robin Faichney wrote:

    > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:17:03AM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > > Hi Robin Faichney -
    > >
    > > >> - to the point of which I have declared, manifesto-like, "To a
    > > >> life without memes!" which, to me, is a utopian and ideal
    > > >> state...
    > > >
    > > >You might be surprised to learn that Sue Blackmore and I are in
    > > >complete agreement with you on that. Of course, we equate
    > > >memelessness with Enlightenment, which you probably don't. But
    > > >then, what does that tell us, other than that your concept of
    > > >Enlightenment differs from ours?
    > >
    > > And I had wondered what one with a buddhist's vocabulary would think
    > > of 'a life without memes' since it is so seemingly identical to a
    > > life without maya.
    > >
    > > I would concur, also, that 'enlightenment' is a good word for this
    > > condition.
    >
    > Picture me pleasantly surprised.
    >
    > > And, yes, I don't think our concepts differ at all. This concept of
    > > a being at raw interface with nature is part of the hero archetype,
    > > after all. It is the beauty of the simple and the powerful playing
    > > together.
    >
    > Indeed.
    >
    The myths of the noble savage and the ancient sage and the
    shamanic/indigenous perfect
    knowledge/understanding/comprehension and the primal eden are
    all themselves maya; pernicious memetic ill- and/or delusions
    passed again and again from the credulous to the gullible.
    > --
    > Robin Faichney
    > Get your Meta-Information from http://www.ii01.org
    > (CAUTION: contains philosophy, may cause heads to spin)
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 15 2001 - 19:37:12 GMT