Re: Geology

From: Zylogy@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 23:43:52 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA16647 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:46:22 GMT
    From: <Zylogy@aol.com>
    Message-ID: <d3.10c02fde.27c45b38@aol.com>
    Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:43:52 EST
    Subject: Re: Geology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    CC: Zylogy@aol.com
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d3.10c02fde.27c45b38_boundary"
    Content-Disposition: Inline
    X-Mailer: 6.0 sub 10506
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    The geological metaphor also has come in handy in certain linguistic circles-
    Joan Bybee (UNewMexico) is a specialist in grammaticalization- the change of
    free lexical items into grammatical forms, even affixes, over historical
    time. She often utilizes geological terminology in her work (she once told me
    she grew up in a household run by geologists). But I think underlying all
    this is simply the need to have a convenient reference frame for dealing with
    systems terminology. Geological, biological, cosmological, takes yer pick. I
    still think its just neat that the world works this way.

    Jess Tauber

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 20 2001 - 23:48:38 GMT