Re: memetics-digest V1 #553

From: Ilfryn PRICE(SED) (I.Price@shu.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:07:07 GMT

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA13483 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:17:25 GMT
    Message-id: <fc.005b8ff100b19e7e3b9aca00cfaa22e1.b19ebc@amazon.shu.ac.uk>
    Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:07:07 +0000
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #553
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: "Ilfryn PRICE(SED)" <I.Price@shu.ac.uk>
    References: <200102200905.JAA13034@alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk>
    In-Reply-To: <200102200905.JAA13034@alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    John Wilkins writing
    >
    >More like we're born with a geology of hard and soft substrates, and
    >where and how long the water flows determines where the riverbeds are...

    prompts the following extract (from Price and Shaw, 1998)
    >

    A geological metaphor provides an image of the physiology and psychology of perception. Imagine a
    landscape, eroded over time to provide streams, rivulets, and rivers interspersed between higher
    plateaux. It provides a simple example of a self-organising, locked-in, system. If one can imagine
    the virgin landscape as being relatively flat, perhaps gently undulating, then as rain falls so it
    tends to find the paths of least resistance: the soft rocks and minor depressions of the undulating
    territory. Over time accumulations of rainfall carve out stream and river beds and settle into
    pools and lakes. Any new rainfall will no longer find its own way but will rather take, and
    reinforce, the already sculpted way. Though the falling rain may be evenly distributed across the
    landscape, in its collection and flow across the land, it will tend towards a predetermined route,
    one taken by previous rainfalls.

    Just as the rainfall follows established routes, so perception follows established ways of
    seeing. Technically, even if the light sources which perturb the back of the retina are
    identical, what will be noticed from all that could be seen, will depend on the perceptual lens
    through which we view the world. The optimists half-full glass is the pessimists half-empty one!
    What is there is not independent of the viewer, as experts in quantum physics will acknowledge.
    What is there is what we have been trained (or conditioned or have learnt) to see. Our training
    in terms of our maps and our lenses means that we will not see certain other things which do not
    fit with the map or lens we carry. We may discard, indeed we can be blind to, anomalies that do not
    fit. The self-organised pattern which we call our thinking grants a particular perceptual blindness
    and rigidity to our perceptions of the world - the very foundation of such things as stereotypes
    and prejudices - common to all human experience and found, for example in the way one department in
    a company may view another.

    What holds for light waves perturbing the retina, holds equally for acoustic perturbances of the
    eardrum. Exploring the analogy further we could say that an idea, a single thought, an utterance, a
    meme in fact, is like the single raindrop. It falls with others upon a pre-formed perceptual
    landscape. Isolated thoughts gather together in a string - a pattern of co-existing memes - which
    we might compare to a few drops congregating together in a splash of water. With sufficient mass
    the splash of water starts to flow into streams and rivers which are, if we like, the connectors
    between the raindrops and the pools and lakes, if not the oceans, of our thoughts. The pools and
    lakes we may view as concept pools and theory lakes. Thus a self-organising system is inherited and
    developed in which the flow of perception takes a certain course, it follows a certain pattern, a
    largely given paradigm.

    Patterns in the brain influence seeing (or more accurately perceiving). Patterns, and seeing
    influence behaviour so that behaviour follows certain patterns. It may be argued that we see the
    world less as it is and more as we are, and that we act perfectly consistent with how we see the
    world. There is a certain alignment with our thinking, our perceptions and our
    actions-in-the-world. Thinking, seeing, and behaving tend to follow pre-existing patterns.

    Well-established patterns become social and cultural norms and preserve and replicate themselves
    through their influence on peoples ongoing perception of the world. The cultural tradition is
    passed on by the language and perceptual habits acquired by succeeding generations and by that
    which we inherit through the cultural artefacts of previous generations, for example their temples,
    books, theories, myths and legends, as well as through our own processes of informal and formal
    education. These may take the form of individual units of cultural transmission - memes - or the
    broader patterns of thinking which Kuhn dubbed paradigms.

    What this amounts to is the assertion that our perceptions of the world provide for our very
    relatedness to the world before us - both in terms of what is seen or noticed, and the meaning or
    interpretation we grant to what is noticed. Perception grants what may be termed our
    Being-in-the-world (An expression first coined by Heidegger in the term Dasein). If we can
    interrupt the pattern of thinking, eschew our memetic and paradigmatic inheritance so as to think,
    and see, newly, then behaviours may naturally follow. To achieve such a difference in thinking and
    seeing we may need to create a different language.

    ______________________________________________________________

    If Price
    Facilities Management Graduate Centre
    Sheffield Hallam University
    Unit 7, Science Park, Sheffield S1 1WB
    P +44 [0]114 225 4032
    F +44 [0]114 225 4038
    http://www.shu.ac.uk/schools/urs/fmgc
    http://members.aol.com/ifprice/ifresch.html

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:19:44 GMT