Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Feb 17 2001 - 18:26:23 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA03428 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:28:54 GMT
Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:26:23 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20010217182623.AAA5557@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.166]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Scott Chase -

    >Why must fitness be brought into the picture?

    Fitness is a slippery word. Personally, I avoid it.

    Although I bicycle to work every day.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 17 2001 - 18:32:15 GMT