RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2001 - 13:30:11 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA25421 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:31:01 GMT
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745C74@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:30:11 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Yeah but why did everybody copy the idiot, not the film?

    I've just thought of another example, stretching back way further-
    Shakespeare's Hamlet, where people say 'Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him well',
    which is incorrect. Again, why do people copy whoever got it wrong rather
    than what was written?

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Wade T.Smith
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:02 pm
    > To: Memetics Discussion List
    > Subject: Re: Darwinian evolution vs memetic evolution
    >
    > Hi Chris Taylor -
    >
    > >Anyway, back to the plot:
    > >
    > >> The problem is what are the major aspects of the cultural environment
    > that
    > >> create selection pressures for memes ... how on earth do we identify
    > why
    > >> 'play it again, sam' prospers rather than the original line?
    > >
    > >Because (I think) there is an issue of a sort of compatibility. I would
    > >think that:
    > >
    > >1) The fitter versions of these memes in some sense resemble more
    > >closely something generic about what is already resident in the mind in
    > >which they undergo their process of selection. Play it again Sam is more
    > >compatible with our idea about the 'cool' lines 'cool' people utter
    > >(effectively in this instance there has been a group rewriting of the
    > >script to give the major character a major, punchy line).
    > >
    > >2) This is a classic meme because it is fairly self sufficient. Even
    > >without knowledge of Bogart or the film it implies a whole scenario to
    > >most of us. A guy who is self-assured, who likes something enought to
    > >want to hear it again but isn't overly excited/happy. There's a lot in
    > >there, and yet only the most generic cultural features are exploited.
    > >The point of a good meme in *this* sense is to be small, info packed and
    > >self-sufficient (given simple culture-environs assumptions, kind of like
    > >minimal growth media). "You feeling lucky punk?" is another (although
    > >less used because of its threatening nature) again it contains much in a
    > >little space, and makes few assumptions about prior knowledge because it
    > >exploits what is generic about our culture. You don't have to have even
    > >heard of Dirty Harry, you could just assume its something like that.
    > >
    > >These sorts of memes are more like viruses in that they have almost
    > >nothing to them (compare, say, Catholicism or elephants), yet because
    > >they are fine tuned to their environment, they do very well. Hook lines
    > >in pop song choruses are another (you rarely remember the relevant
    > >verses).
    > >
    > >This is the bottom of the meme size scale though, and unfortunately the
    > >focus of most pop memetics. Higher order structures should not be
    > >ignored (organisms, ecosystems).
    > >
    > >Time I stopped warbling, Chris.
    >
    > In actual and vivid fact, the "how on earth do we identify why 'play it
    > again, sam' prospers rather than the original line?" problem is simple to
    > the point of completeness- some blinking asshole said it wrong.
    >
    > Because, there ain't no 'right' fit in a land of constantly changing
    > sizes.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 15 2001 - 13:33:06 GMT