Re: Human Genome

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Feb 13 2001 - 06:01:48 GMT

  • Next message: Dr Able Lawrence: "Re: Human Genome"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA13884 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:58:05 GMT
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:01:48 -0600
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Human Genome
    Message-ID: <3A88796C.623.E1B82E@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102131046040.19692-100000@sushrut.sgpgi.ac.in>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 13 Feb 2001, at 11:08, Dr Able Lawrence wrote:

    That's 30,000.
    >
    > Hi All,
    > Genome report (only 3000 genes) is not really surprising at
    > all if
    > we understand the implications of the recently discovered complexities
    > in gene expression regulation The transcription factors are huge multi
    > subunit complexes with countless interactions amongst them. The
    > permutation and combination possible for interactions amongst
    > transcription factors is realy mind boggling. There is more to
    > genetics than mere genes and DNA sequences.
    > The real implication of the new finding is that one gene- one
    > function hypothesis is dead. Now we know that a single gene can
    > produce myriad proteins like the immunoglobuin or T cell receptor or
    > neural adhesion molecules involved in the complex wiring of the
    > nervous system. On the contrary multiple genes are required for
    > functional units (multi subunit complexes) involved in such vital
    > functions as regulation of gene expression or respiration or protein
    > synthesis.
    > A lot of the complexity in higher organism is probably at the
    > level
    > of gene-gene interactions and the complex cascading and epigenetic
    > effects on gene expression.
    > To emphasize the point further, all our cells have the same DNA
    > sequence (well almost) but are morphologically and functionally
    > diverse.
    > So it is not necessary to have different sets of genes but more
    > fine
    > tuned interactions to create us humans.
    > As I pointed out earlier that smple minor variations in gene
    > expressions can have profound morphological implications. So the gene
    > regulating embryogenesis (Hox genes) are highly conserved vertically
    > in the evolutionary ladder (ladder itself is an anthropocentric view
    > and other organisms can object!)
    > Throughout evolution new functions have rarely ever come about by
    > inventing new genes (it takes too much directed ingenuity for that,
    > may be only Lamarck or biotechnologists a few decades down the line
    > can only do it) but by making new use or modifying old genes. Once
    > useful but rudimentary function is discovered for an old gene,
    > variation and evolution (and duplication if the old gene already has
    > an indispensable function) would be favoured and would arise in due
    > course of time. Duplication of genes in malignant clones in the body
    > is a case in point.
    > It would be ridiculous to say that the multidrug resistance gene in
    > human malignancy had the same function before that begins to get
    > favoured by surviving tumour cells.
    > We must view genes as dynamically interacting
    > information
    > and also should not forget that the genes get their properties through
    > the proteins they encode (with all the complexities of protein
    > chemistry and protein protein interaction)
    >
    > Anthropocentrism is alive only in Christian theology!!
    >
    >
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > Dr Able Lawrence MD
    > Senior Resident
    > Clinical Immunology
    > SGPGIMS, Lucknow
    > able@sgpgi.ac.in
    > Ph +91 98390 70247
    > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 13 2001 - 06:00:12 GMT