Re: Fewer genes than expected

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Feb 12 2001 - 20:24:47 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: Labels for memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA12367 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:51:41 GMT
    Message-ID: <001b01c09532$0a77ca20$6b0bbed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <001501c09465$7fff0100$800cbed4@default> <3A880CD0.6C5C9337@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: Fewer genes than expected
    Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:24:47 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 5:18 PM
    Subject: Re: Fewer genes than expected

    > Dear Kenneth,
    >
    > Here is a quote from the Nature article (Vol. 409, p. 901), on
    > www.nature.com.
    >
    > > The human thus appears to have only about twice as many genes
    > > as worm or fly. However, human genes differ in important respects
    > > from those in worm and fly. They are spread out over much larger
    > > regions of genomic DNA, and they are used to construct more
    > > alternative transcripts. This may result in perhaps five times as many
    > > primary protein products in the human as in the worm or fly.
    >
    > IOW, gene number is only a gross estimate of phenotypic complexity.

    << I agree, but than again, think about the possibilities which do present
    them here before our eyes !!
    Think, try to comprehend what kind of alternative transcripts we are tal-
    king about here !! All kinds of possible memetical transcriptions and as
    a consequence all kinds of ( memetical) behaviour is changed is favor of
    its own existence. Environment/ learning processes/ thought/ having ideas/
    culture/...is far more important than we ever could suspect.
    Think about this in favor of memetics. We are left here with an enormous
    task...we have IMO to look at memetics, from now on, from a complete
    different angle. Memes are not holding culture on a leach, they " are "
    in a sense ' culture '.
    This is IMO the major scientific breakthrough as a memetisist where I was
    waiting for.
    This is Waaaaauw !!

    Best,

    Kenneth

    ( I am, because we are) I don 't know what to say....

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 12 2001 - 19:53:51 GMT